Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Anderson (photographer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Anderson (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cameraman. Doesn't pass independent GNG. Pipsally (talk) 06:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Pipsally (talk) 06:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Has no inline citations either, which is required for BLPs. --pandakekok9 (talk) 12:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Here's his website, while it was still up; but its content is not encouraging. I've no enthusiasm for my delete "!vote", because I think that nature photographers get a bum deal; but however unjust the lack of coverage may be, a WP article can't make up for the lack. -- Hoary (talk) 07:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.